Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Explore (NY) ; 10(6): 345-9, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25256021
2.
Am J Ind Med ; 56(8): 845-55, 2013 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23280646

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Northeast farmworkers are a small, widely dispersed, and isolated population. Little is known about their occupational injury and illness risk. METHODS: Researchers conducted chart reviews in migrant health centers across the Northeast, and calculated incidence-density for agricultural morbidity based on a new method for estimating total worker hours at risk, and adjusting for cases seen at other sources of care. RESULTS: An estimated annual average of 1,260 cases translated to an incidence of 30.27 per 10,000 worker weeks, (12.7 per 100 FTEs). Straining/spraining events (56% cases) was the most common occurrence (16.8 per 10,000 worker weeks), and lifting (21.5% cases) was the leading contributing factor. Incidence by crop category ranged from 12.95 (ground crop) to 29.69 (bush crop) per 10,000 weeks. Only 2.8% filed for Workers' Compensation. CONCLUSION: The predominance of straining/spraining events affecting the back, and their association with lifting suggests that Northeastern farmworker occupational health programs should focus on ergonomics, and specifically on safe lifting.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Trabajadores Agrícolas/epidemiología , Agricultura , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/epidemiología , Esguinces y Distensiones/epidemiología , Migrantes , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedades de los Trabajadores Agrícolas/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Mid-Atlantic Region/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , New England/epidemiología , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/etiología , Vigilancia de la Población , Esguinces y Distensiones/etiología , Adulto Joven
3.
Ital J Anat Embryol ; 116(2): 73-92, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22303636

RESUMEN

Since the discoveries of a putative AIDS virus in 1984 and of millions of asymptomatic carriers in subsequent years, no general AIDS epidemic has occurred by 2011. In 2008, however, it has been proposed that between 2000 and 2005 the new AIDS virus, now called HIV, had killed 1.8 million South Africans at a steady rate of 300,000 per year and that anti-HIV drugs could have saved 330,000 of those. Here we investigate these claims in view of the paradoxes that HIV would cause a general epidemic in Africa but not in other continents, and a steady rather than a classical bell-shaped epidemic like all other new pathogenic viruses. Surprisingly, we found that South Africa attributed only about 10,000 deaths per year to HIV between 2000 and 2005 and that the South African population had increased by 3 million between 2000 and 2005 at a steady rate of 500,000 per year. This gain was part of a monotonic growth trajectory spanning from 29 million in 1980 to 49 million in 2008. During the same time Uganda increased from 12 to 31 million, and Sub-Saharan Africa as a whole doubled from 400 to 800 million, despite high prevalence HIV. We deduce from this demographic evidence that HIV is not a new killer virus. Based on a review of the known toxicities of antiretroviral drugs we like to draw the attention of scientists, who work in basic and clinical medical fields, including embryologists, to the need of rethinking the risk-and-benefit balance of antiretroviral drugs for pregnant women, newborn babies and all others who carry antibodies against HIV.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida/mortalidad , Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida/virología , Epidemias/estadística & datos numéricos , VIH-1/patogenicidad , Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida/tratamiento farmacológico , África del Sur del Sahara/epidemiología , Causalidad , Países en Desarrollo , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalencia
4.
Med Hypotheses ; 2009 Jul 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19619953

RESUMEN

This Article-in-Press has been permanently withdrawn. The editorial policy of Medical Hypotheses makes it clear that the journal considers "radical, speculative, and non-mainstream scientific ideas", and articles will only be acceptable if they are "coherent and clearly expressed." However, we received serious expressions of concern about the quality of this article, which contains highly controversial opinions about the causes of AIDS, opinions that could potentially be damaging to global public health. Given these important signals of concern, we commissioned an external expert panel to investigate the circumstances in which this article came to be published online. The panel recommended that the article should be externally peer-reviewed. Following a peer-review process managed by The Lancet editorial team, all five external reviewers recommended rejection, as a result of which the expert panel recommended permanent withdrawal. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy.

5.
Ital J Anat Embryol ; 114(4): 179-91, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20578674

RESUMEN

Ruggiero et al. (2009) have recently reviewed the importance of dissection in the training of physicians, the role played by students' fears of infection, and the evidence that those sometimes extreme fears are unwarranted even respecting HIV and AIDS, whose dangers continue to be featured prominently in popular media as though everyone were at constant risk. It is not especially surprising that the risk of accidental infection by HIV is negligibly low in random dissections in Italy where, as in Europe generally, the prevalence of HIV is only a fraction of a percent. The question arises, however, what the risk might be in regions where the prevalence of HIV is considerably higher. South Africa is an obvious candidate for investigating this issue since the prevalence of HIV there is among the highest reported by UNAIDS and other official bodies. Furthermore, its recordkeeping system is more reliable than that of most other countries in sub-Saharan Africa, the global region that is universally regarded as the epicenter of the HIV/AIDS epidemic. In addition, South Africa has a globally recognized reputation in the teaching of human anatomy. Perhaps surprisingly, the risks in South Africa also seem to be much less than might be anticipated on the basis of the conventional wisdom. One reason for this counter-intuitive conclusion is that estimates of HIV prevalence and of AIDS deaths issued by international bodies are significantly overblown, with some estimates being 20 times or more greater than locally recorded numbers. A second basis for the unexpected conclusion is that the possibility of false-positive HIV tests has been ignored despite the considerable range of evidence that false-positives can be a significant part, perhaps even a major part, of positive tests in certain groups or certain regions, saliently among people of African ancestry.


Asunto(s)
Disección/efectos adversos , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Infecciones por VIH/etiología , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Cadáver , Cultura , Disección/normas , Contaminación de Equipos/prevención & control , Contaminación de Equipos/estadística & datos numéricos , Reacciones Falso Positivas , Seropositividad para VIH/epidemiología , Seroprevalencia de VIH/tendencias , Humanos , Exposición Profesional/normas , Prevalencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Seguridad/normas , Seguridad/estadística & datos numéricos , Sudáfrica/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...